Home > News > Keeping the nanotech score
November 17th, 2005
Abstract:
Richard Jones: A claim from Lux research (reported in Small Times here) that China is now second only to the USA in its output of academic nanoscience papers is being met with some scepticism over on Nanodot. While there is clearly a real and important story about the huge recent growth in nanoscience capability in China, I’m also a bit sceptical about the central claim of this story, about China’s publication share. Of course, I don’t know about the detailed methodology in the publications study the Lux report cites. But I do know how a study which reached a very similar conclusion, commissioned for the UK’s science funding agency EPSRC, was done. Essentially, a database search was done for papers with “nano” or some compound thereof in the title.
Source:
Soft Machines
Bookmark:
| Related News Press |
Miscellaneous
Editorial: Choices for Congress September 9th, 2010
Stephen Hawking - 'Don't Talk to Aliens' April 26th, 2010
It’s about damn time: Medvedev bans nanodemocracy April 15th, 2010
Savor maple syrup time in Ohio: Travel in 3s February 20th, 2010
 |
||
 |
||
| The latest news from around the world, FREE | ||
 |
||
|
|
||
| Premium Products | ||
 |
||
|
Only the news you want to read!
Learn More |
||
 |
||
|
Full-service, expert consulting
Learn More |
||
|
|
||